(Keep in mind that this post is written from pure spontaneous thought; I haven't given this question any previous thought. In fact, prior to writing this post, I've never even heard this question. )
Ok, I'm going to start off with a broad, messy definition, and see if I can't whittle it down into something nice, narrow, and neat. Let's start with:
To be rich means that I will have a lot of money.So far so good. Hmm, I think that the words 'a lot of money' is too arbitrary. Let's change it something that is a bit more tangible/measurable. 'Will be able to purchase whatever I'd like' seems like a good replacement, but the thing is, people who have access to credit cards can pretty much buy whatever they'd like (although they shouldn't), but they're not necessarily rich. So, I'd better tack on some words that'll eliminate that bit of unclarity. I thinking tacking on 'with my own cash' will seperate me from people who have high credit limits. So thus far we have:
To be rich means that I will be able to purchase whatever I'd like with my own cash.We've made quite a bit of progress right there. I think now is a good time for a break. 10 minutes should be good enough, no? Go ahead, use the bathroom or grab a bite to eat or whatever, I can wait. We still have a long way to go.
[Waits]
Ok ready? Let's continue. I've been thinking about replacing the phrase 'purchase whatever I'd like.' There are lots of people who can "purchase whatever they'd like", but they are by no means rich based on their financial statements or by society's standards. I mean, if all a person really likes is toilet paper, and he goes out and purchases toilet paper, then he is technically buying whatever he likes. So, I'm going to remove that phrase and replace it with 'spend over $10,000 at once.' I'll also throw on 'at anytime that I want' and 'without skipping a heart beat' for good measure. After a little bit of grammatical restructuring, we've got:
To be rich means that I will be able to spend over $10,000 of my own cash at anytime that I want without skipping a heartbeat.I think that definition is pretty good as it covers a lot of aspects that most would consider are limited to the rich only, but I want to take the definition even further. I want a definition that is indisputable from almost every angle, so I'm going to narrow it down even further. What else do wealthy people have in common? Ah ha! I've got it. There are people that are so rich that they don't have to go to work. But then again, there are people who don't work who are most definitely not rich, and there are also people who don't work (they got fired from their jobs) that can spend over $10,000 of their own money at once without missing a heartbeat but won't be able to sustain that lifestyle for too long. I'd better change the wording up to cover all of my bases. Well, I'm a big fan of passive income, but some people would consider managing passive income to be work, so I can't just say passive income outright. I'd better attach something else onto that for a more complete definition. I wonder how this would look:
To be rich means that I will be my own boss for any job or business that I choose to do, if any at all. I will also be able to generate enough passive income that will allow me to spend over $10,000 of my own cash at anytime without skipping a heartbeat.It's almost there, but not quite. I can technically fulfill this definition, but not be considered a millionaire. I know some people would not consider you to be wealthy unless you were at least a multi-millionaire. If I said I was rich, and they ask "Are you a multi-million/billionaire?" and I would say "No" and they would turn around before I get to give them my definition of a person that is materialistically rich. So, just to please all of you millionaire minded people, I'm going to add on a special conditional sentence just for you.
To be rich means that I will be my own boss for any job or business that I choose to do, if any at all. I will also be able to generate enough passive income that will allow me to spend over $10,000 of my own cash at anytime without skipping a heartbeat. I will at all times maintain a net worth of at least $2 million where at least $1 million of my assets will be strictly cash or checkable deposits.We have certainly come a long way from our starting point. I think that this description of wealth covers pretty much every reasonable aspect a person can think of when thinking about money. So until further notice, whenever I say rich or wealthy or any variation of those two words, this is what I mean. I don't think that this characterization of wealth is too unreasonable; there are plenty of people who have attained this, or at least have come very close. Well, now that I have a better idea of what I mean when I say I'm trying to make my way from rags to riches, I think I'd better start working harder because I am very far away from being what I call rich.
What do you guys think? How does your definition of wealth (remember, materialistic wealth only) differ from mine? I'd love to read all of your different opinions and see the different point of views out there on what kinds of thresholds that people have to pass before they can consider themselves to be rich.
2 comments
"Being born in a First world country is the same as winning the lottery." My Father told me that when I was in grade school and clueless about what wealth and riches meant. Statistically it's pretty accurate. Roughly, you had about a 66% chance of being born in an impoverished nation than being born as a citizen in any of the 1st world countries. You get bonus points for being born as a citizen of a super power though.
April 30, 2009 3:04 PMMaybe you're concentrating to much on the bottom line; most people on the planet consider you rich already. If you were born in India you would definitely consider yourself "Rich" if you had an American Call Center Job that paid 25k per year.
Our definitions of Rich are skewed because we're Americans with marketable skills. I'm probably never going to have a day in my life where I'm actually hungry. (Not Hungry like: --Man, I really want a Cheese Burger with extra pickles. Hungry like: --I'm going to die if I don't eat this subway sandwich I pulled out of the dumpster behind the liquor store.)
I guess what I'm saying is that Rich is relative. You consider having 1M in liquid Net Worth being Rich, but I'm going to guess that the manager of a Hedge Fund considers that to be borderline poverty.
I like your definition of being rich.
May 4, 2009 1:10 PMSome people think they are rich when they get a certain house, car, vacation home, boat, etc. To me, this just means being in debt.
My definition is that if you can't get up in the morning and decide what you would like to do with your day, then you aren't rich, no mater what you own.
I could live this type of lifestyle on a lot less than a Million dollars. But, maintaining it for 40 years on interst income would get tricky.
If I had to put up a dollar amount, I would say $2-10 Million would make me feel rich.
Post a Comment